Non-Authentic Information
Information and public opinion have become some of the most valuable commodities in the world, with companies often sacrificing their integrity for it. Only a few large countries dominate this space, leading to a complex web of strategies, much like in a real war with spies and double agents.
There are numerous concrete examples where governments have been overthrown through mass manipulation. A notable example is the revolution in Egypt a few years ago, which would not have been possible without the manipulation of (social) media. Fortunately for Egypt, certain groups were able to reorganize and counteract some of the damage, leading to a second revolution. However, this situation highlights how dangerous and difficult it is to both execute and defend against such manipulation—a veritable Pandora’s box.
Information Manipulation
The manipulation of data can lead to catastrophic consequences, including the distortion of election results and, in extreme cases, genocide.
Distinguishing between truth and falsehood has become increasingly difficult. One pressing issue that needs to be addressed is the role of anonymity and reputation. A new internet paradigm is necessary to tackle these challenges.
For further reading, see:
Relevant Links:
- Manipulating Social Media to Undermine Democracy
- Social Media Manipulation by Political Actors
- Internet Manipulation
- State-Sponsored Internet Propaganda
- Russian Interference in the 2016 U.S. Elections
- Strategic Implications for Africa from Russia's Invasion in Ukraine
Cyber manipulation and cyberattacks are among the most efficient methods to destabilize entire nations and seize power.
Certain countries have been preparing for this for many years, allowing them to disconnect their internet from the global network—a move we believe is not the right solution. Such a step would reverse one of the most significant developments of the last century: the internet’s role in providing global access to information and collaboration. Reverting to 100 separate internets would be a disastrous regression. But it begs the question: why do powerful countries like these feel the need to be able to sever and control their internet?